What's the difference between "general" and "generic"?
Apr 30, 2014 · Generic is the opposite of specific. Generic and specific refer to the identification of a fact. Specific means a fact that has been specified. If you ask for (specify) a pain reliever, …
C# Generics and Type Checking - Stack Overflow
In case you happen to have a generic method that returns a generic value but doesn't have generic parameters, you can use default(T) + (T)(object) cast, together with C# 8 pattern …
How do you provide a default type for generics? - Stack Overflow
Jul 8, 2009 · The generic parameter type will be the same for all methods, so I would like it at the class level. I know I could make a generic version and then inherit from it for the int version, …
How can I pass in a func with a generic type parameter?
Mar 24, 2014 · You can certainly define generic delegates, after all, that's exactly what Func and Action are. They are treated as generic definitions, just like generic interfaces and classes are. …
Creating a generic method in C# - Stack Overflow
Jan 27, 2010 · I am trying to combine a bunch of similar methods into a generic method. I have several methods that return the value of a querystring, or null if that querystring does not exist …
c# - How to compare values of generic types? - Stack Overflow
What keeps us from comparing the values of generic types which are known to be IComparable? Doesn't it somehow defeat the entire purpose of generic constraints?
How do I get the type name of a generic type argument?
Jan 5, 2017 · 26 This extension method outputs the simple type name for non-generic types, and appends the list of generic arguments for generic types. This works fine for scenarios where …
How do I get a class instance of generic type T? - Stack Overflow
I have a generics class, Foo<T>. In a method of Foo, I want to get the class instance of type T, but I just can't call T.class. What is the preferred way to get around it using T.class?
Can I make a generic optional, defaulting to a certain class?
Dec 5, 2012 · My question is related to Is there a reasonable approach to "default" type parameters in C# Generics?, but using an inner generic class that approach doesn't work. …
Using a 'using alias = class' with generic types? [duplicate]
using LookupDictionary = System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<string, int>; Now I want to accomplish the same with a generic type, while preserving it as a generic type: